With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, various AI technologies have been widely applied, and one application called imageX has caught people's attention. imageX is an AICG application available on both Apple and Android devices, allowing users to generate images based on text input and offering different styles of image generator effects. This innovative technology has sparked discussions about the future of creation, with some wondering whether imageX can replace human painting and become the main force in future artistic endeavors. Firstly, imageX leverages AI technology to automatically generate images, giving it an advantage in the creative process. Unlike traditional painting, imageX can quickly generate various styles of images based on user-inputted text, providing creators with more choices and inspirational material. This ability to swiftly generate images enhances productivity and saves time and effort for creators who require a large amount of visual content. Secondly, imageX's intelligent generation capability opens up new possibilities for artistic creation. By applying AI technology, imageX can generate images in different styles and even adjust the visual effects based on user preferences. This attractive feature appeals to creators who aim to work with specific styles. Furthermore, by learning from user preferences and feedback, imageX continuously improves the quality of generated images, gradually approaching the level of human painting. However, despite the advantages in the creative process, there is still a debate over whether imageX can completely replace human painting. On one hand, although imageX can generate images based on user-inputted text, the generated images are still limited by preset algorithms and models, unable to fully express the individuality and emotions of the creator. In contrast, human painting often combines inspiration and artistic skills, resulting in works with richer connotations and originality. On the other hand, human painting possesses unique artistic and creative qualities that cannot be replicated by imageX. The uniqueness of human paintings stems from the thoughts and insights of the creators, making each artwork one of a kind and impossible to be fully simulated by algorithms. Meanwhile, while imageX generates diverse images, it lacks the personal touch and unique perspectives of human creators. In conclusion, despite the many advantages it offers in the creative process, there is still contention regarding whether imageX can entirely replace human painting. While imageX can generate diverse images, enhance efficiency, and provide creative inspiration, it cannot replicate the artistic qualities and unique perspectives found in human paintings. Therefore, human painting will continue to play an important role in artistic creation, with imageX potentially serving as an auxiliary tool, offering more possibilities for creativity. We look forward to a future where artificial intelligence and human creation can harmoniously merge and flourish.