With the continuous advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), it has permeated various fields, including art creation. imageX is an AI-powered text-to-image application that presents different styles of images by simply inputting text. The emergence of this AI technology has sparked discussions on whether we should embrace or reject this new form of creation. The advantages of embracing AI creative tools like imageX are undeniable. Firstly, imageX offers users a more diverse and personalized range of creative styles. For designers, artists, or creators, this automated image generation tool can greatly enhance productivity, freeing up their time and energy to focus more on creative expression. With its AI algorithms, imageX can mimic various art styles, from impressionism to modernism, watercolors to cubism, enabling users to achieve personalized creations based on their preferences. Secondly, AI creative tools broaden the boundaries of creativity. Through self-learning, imageX's AI algorithms continuously improve their creative ability and expressive capacity. This means imageX can help users challenge their creative limits and produce more innovative and imaginative works. For those with ideas but lacking artistic skills, imageX provides a platform to realize their concepts through text input, resulting in genuinely unique art pieces. However, embracing AI creative tools also raises concerns and controversies. Firstly, some worry that AI-generated works may undermine the status and uniqueness of human artists' creations. They argue that AI-generated artwork lacks the emotional depth and cognitive capability of human artists, unable to truly express the soul of art. Furthermore, AI creative tools raise questions about copyright and intellectual property rights. When AI-generated works are involved in commercial usage, the issue of whether copyright fees should be paid becomes a topic for consideration. In this heated discussion, we must admit that AI creative tools have become a growing trend that cannot be reversed. AI technology, as an assistive tool for creativity, offers human creators more possibilities. Represented by imageX, which generates images from text, users can create personalized and diverse artworks. Whether to embrace or reject AI creative tools requires deep contemplation. Therefore, we believe that AI tools like imageX are not meant to replace traditional art creation but to provide alternative creative approaches and tools for artists. Proper understanding and utilization of AI creative potential can enhance productivity and promote artistic development to a certain extent. However, it is also essential to preserve respect and appreciation for traditional art, recognizing the unique aspects of human creativity that AI cannot fully replace. In conclusion, imageX as an AI creative tool brings about greater possibilities and personalized artistic experiences. We can embrace this innovative technology, while maintaining respect and attention toward traditional art. Only by striking a balance between AI and human creativity can we drive the progression of artistic innovation, infusing creations with vitality and uniqueness.